Skip to main content

Georgetown vs Googong

Property investment comparison - Georgetown, NSW 2298 vs Googong, NSW 2620

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Georgetown wins 3, Googong wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGeorgetownGoogong
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$710K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.77%3.60%
Gross rental yield (units)4.10%-
1-year house growth+8.5%estimate+6.4%
3-year house growth-+7.6%
Vacancy rate0.8%3.1%
Population2,0727,444

Georgetown vs Googong: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.1M in Georgetown and $1.1M in Googong.

On cash flow, Georgetown leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.77%, compared with 3.60% in Googong, a gap of 0.17 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +8.5% in Georgetown (an estimate) and +6.4% in Googong, so recent momentum favours Georgetown, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Georgetown and 3.1% in Googong, so landlords in Georgetown face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Googong is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,444 against 2,072, roughly 3.6 times the size of Georgetown; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Georgetown for rental income, Georgetown for recent price momentum, Georgetown for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison