Skip to main content

Georgetown vs Jewells

Property investment comparison - Georgetown, NSW 2298 vs Jewells, NSW 2280

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Georgetown wins 4, Jewells wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGeorgetownJewells
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$710K$790K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.77%3.86%
Gross rental yield (units)4.10%3.50%
1-year house growth+8.5%estimate+9.2%
3-year house growth-+32.8%
Vacancy rate0.8%3.6%
Population2,0722,452

Georgetown vs Jewells: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.1M in Georgetown and $1.1M in Jewells, so Georgetown is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Georgetown sits at a median of $710K against $790K in Jewells, which makes Georgetown the more affordable unit market and Jewells the pricier one.

On cash flow, Jewells leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.86%, compared with 3.77% in Georgetown, a gap of 0.09 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +8.5% in Georgetown (an estimate) and +9.2% in Jewells, so recent momentum favours Jewells, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Georgetown and 3.6% in Jewells, so landlords in Georgetown face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Jewells is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,452 against 2,072, larger than Georgetown; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Jewells for rental income, Georgetown for a lower purchase price, Jewells for recent price momentum, Georgetown for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison