Gilead vs Ourimbah
Property investment comparison - Gilead, NSW 2560 vs Ourimbah, NSW 2258
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Gilead wins 3, Ourimbah wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Gilead | Ourimbah |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.2M | $1.2M |
| Median unit price | $525K | $685K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.59% | 3.36% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 4.61% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +2.6% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +12.0% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.1% | 1.9% |
| Population | 882 | 4,019 |
Gilead vs Ourimbah: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.2M in Gilead and $1.2M in Ourimbah, so Ourimbah is the cheaper entry point.
For units, Gilead sits at a median of $525K against $685K in Ourimbah, which makes Gilead the more affordable unit market and Ourimbah the pricier one.
On cash flow, Gilead leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.59%, compared with 3.36% in Ourimbah, a gap of 0.23 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Gilead and 1.9% in Ourimbah, so landlords in Gilead face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Ourimbah is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,019 against 882, roughly 4.6 times the size of Gilead; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Gilead for rental income, Ourimbah for a lower purchase price, Gilead for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison