Gilead vs Wyee Point
Property investment comparison - Gilead, NSW 2560 vs Wyee Point, NSW 2259
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Gilead wins 2, Wyee Point wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Gilead | Wyee Point |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.2M | $1.2M |
| Median unit price | $525K | $175K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.59% | 3.50% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 4.46% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +15.1%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.1% | 2.0% |
| Population | 882 | 1,171 |
Gilead vs Wyee Point: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.2M in Gilead and $1.2M in Wyee Point.
For units, Gilead sits at a median of $525K against $175K in Wyee Point, which makes Wyee Point the more affordable unit market and Gilead the pricier one.
On cash flow, Gilead leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.59%, compared with 3.50% in Wyee Point, a gap of 0.09 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Gilead and 2.0% in Wyee Point, so landlords in Gilead face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Wyee Point is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,171 against 882, larger than Gilead; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Gilead for rental income, Gilead for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison