Glen Forrest vs Guildford
Property investment comparison - Glen Forrest, WA 6071 vs Guildford, WA 6055
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Glen Forrest wins 2, Guildford wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Glen Forrest | Guildford |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.2M | $1.2M |
| Median unit price | $640K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.15% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.09% | 5.50% |
| 1-year house growth | +16.3% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +67.8% | +57.9% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.0% | 0.3% |
| Population | 2,789 | 2,040 |
Glen Forrest vs Guildford: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.2M in Glen Forrest and $1.2M in Guildford, so Glen Forrest is the cheaper entry point, with Guildford houses about 1% dearer.
Looking back three years, Glen Forrest houses are +67.8% and Guildford houses +57.9%, so Glen Forrest has compounded faster than Guildford over the longer window.
Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Guildford and 1.0% in Glen Forrest, so landlords in Guildford face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Glen Forrest is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,789 against 2,040, larger than Guildford; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Glen Forrest for a lower purchase price, Guildford for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison