Glendaruel vs Kurunjang
Property investment comparison - Glendaruel, VIC 3363 vs Kurunjang, VIC 3337
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Glendaruel wins 3, Kurunjang wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Glendaruel | Kurunjang |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $615K | $620K |
| Median unit price | - | $450K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.95% | 3.64% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 4.80% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +12.8% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +18.3% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.0% | 2.4% |
| Population | 49 | 10,711 |
Glendaruel vs Kurunjang: what the numbers say
The median house price is $615K in Glendaruel and $620K in Kurunjang, so Glendaruel is the cheaper entry point, with Kurunjang houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Glendaruel leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.95%, compared with 3.64% in Kurunjang, a gap of 0.31 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Glendaruel and 2.4% in Kurunjang, so landlords in Glendaruel face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Kurunjang is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,711 against 49, roughly 219 times the size of Glendaruel; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Glendaruel for rental income, Glendaruel for a lower purchase price, Glendaruel for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison