Glendevie vs Punchbowl
Property investment comparison - Glendevie, TAS 7109 vs Punchbowl, TAS 7249
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Glendevie wins 2, Punchbowl wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Glendevie | Punchbowl |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $570K | $575K |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.74% | 4.47% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 7.11% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +15.2% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +28.2% |
| Vacancy rate | 0.2% | 0.9% |
| Population | 87 | 491 |
Glendevie vs Punchbowl: what the numbers say
The median house price is $570K in Glendevie and $575K in Punchbowl, so Glendevie is the cheaper entry point, with Punchbowl houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Punchbowl leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.47%, compared with 2.74% in Glendevie, a gap of 1.73 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.2% in Glendevie and 0.9% in Punchbowl, so landlords in Glendevie face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Punchbowl is the bigger suburb, with a population of 491 against 87, roughly 6 times the size of Glendevie; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Punchbowl for rental income, Glendevie for a lower purchase price, Glendevie for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison