Skip to main content

Glenella vs Point Vernon

Property investment comparison - Glenella, QLD 4740 vs Point Vernon, QLD 4655

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Glenella wins 3, Point Vernon wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGlenellaPoint Vernon
Median house price$820K$815K
Median unit price-$555K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.89%4.00%
Gross rental yield (units)6.08%-
1-year house growth+12.6%+14.4%
3-year house growth+45.0%+37.4%
Vacancy rate2.2%2.9%
Population4,5455,718

Glenella vs Point Vernon: what the numbers say

The median house price is $820K in Glenella and $815K in Point Vernon, so Point Vernon is the cheaper entry point, with Glenella houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Glenella leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.89%, compared with 4.00% in Point Vernon, a gap of 0.89 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +12.6% in Glenella and +14.4% in Point Vernon, so recent momentum favours Point Vernon, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Glenella houses are +45.0% and Point Vernon houses +37.4%, so Glenella has compounded faster than Point Vernon over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 2.2% in Glenella and 2.9% in Point Vernon, so landlords in Glenella face less competition for tenants.

Point Vernon is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,718 against 4,545, larger than Glenella; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Glenella for rental income, Point Vernon for a lower purchase price, Point Vernon for recent price momentum, Glenella for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison