Skip to main content

Glenella vs Urangan

Property investment comparison - Glenella, QLD 4740 vs Urangan, QLD 4655

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Glenella wins 2, Urangan wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGlenellaUrangan
Median house price$820K$815K
Median unit price-$605K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.89%3.95%
Gross rental yield (units)6.08%-
1-year house growth+12.6%+14.1%
3-year house growth+45.0%+31.5%
Vacancy rate2.2%1.3%
Population4,54510,988

Glenella vs Urangan: what the numbers say

The median house price is $820K in Glenella and $815K in Urangan, so Urangan is the cheaper entry point, with Glenella houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Glenella leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.89%, compared with 3.95% in Urangan, a gap of 0.94 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +12.6% in Glenella and +14.1% in Urangan, so recent momentum favours Urangan, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Glenella houses are +45.0% and Urangan houses +31.5%, so Glenella has compounded faster than Urangan over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Urangan and 2.2% in Glenella, so landlords in Urangan face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Urangan is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,988 against 4,545, roughly 2.4 times the size of Glenella; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Glenella for rental income, Urangan for a lower purchase price, Urangan for recent price momentum, Urangan for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison