Skip to main content

Glenfyne vs Mernda

Property investment comparison - Glenfyne, VIC 3266 vs Mernda, VIC 3754

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Glenfyne wins 2, Mernda wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGlenfyneMernda
Median house price$755K$750K
Median unit price$310K$500K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.61%3.81%
Gross rental yield (units)4.05%4.95%
1-year house growth-+4.9%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate0.5%2.0%
Population13123,369

Glenfyne vs Mernda: what the numbers say

The median house price is $755K in Glenfyne and $750K in Mernda, so Mernda is the cheaper entry point, with Glenfyne houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Glenfyne sits at a median of $310K against $500K in Mernda, which makes Glenfyne the more affordable unit market and Mernda the pricier one.

On cash flow, Mernda leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.81%, compared with 2.61% in Glenfyne, a gap of 1.20 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Glenfyne and 2.0% in Mernda, so landlords in Glenfyne face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Mernda is the bigger suburb, with a population of 23,369 against 131, roughly 178 times the size of Glenfyne; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Mernda for rental income, Mernda for a lower purchase price, Glenfyne for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison