Skip to main content

Glenning Valley vs Hawks Nest

Property investment comparison - Glenning Valley, NSW 2261 vs Hawks Nest, NSW 2324

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Glenning Valley wins 2, Hawks Nest wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGlenning ValleyHawks Nest
Median house price$1.2M$1.2M
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)4.10%2.69%
Gross rental yield (units)4.43%3.88%
1-year house growth+4.9%estimate-
3-year house growth-+34.5%
Vacancy rate1.5%1.2%
Population2,0231,413

Glenning Valley vs Hawks Nest: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.2M in Glenning Valley and $1.2M in Hawks Nest.

On cash flow, Glenning Valley leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.10%, compared with 2.69% in Hawks Nest, a gap of 1.41 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Hawks Nest and 1.5% in Glenning Valley, so landlords in Hawks Nest face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Glenning Valley is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,023 against 1,413, larger than Hawks Nest; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Glenning Valley for rental income, Hawks Nest for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison