Skip to main content

Glenning Valley vs Marsden Park

Property investment comparison - Glenning Valley, NSW 2261 vs Marsden Park, NSW 2765

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Glenning Valley wins 4, Marsden Park wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGlenning ValleyMarsden Park
Median house price$1.2M$1.2M
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)4.10%3.58%
Gross rental yield (units)4.43%4.21%
1-year house growth+4.9%estimate+3.0%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.5%4.3%
Population2,02314,610

Glenning Valley vs Marsden Park: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.2M in Glenning Valley and $1.2M in Marsden Park.

On cash flow, Glenning Valley leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.10%, compared with 3.58% in Marsden Park, a gap of 0.52 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +4.9% in Glenning Valley (an estimate) and +3.0% in Marsden Park (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Glenning Valley, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Glenning Valley and 4.3% in Marsden Park, so landlords in Glenning Valley face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Marsden Park is the bigger suburb, with a population of 14,610 against 2,023, roughly 7 times the size of Glenning Valley; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Glenning Valley for rental income, Glenning Valley for recent price momentum, Glenning Valley for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison