Skip to main content

Glenrowan vs Laverton

Property investment comparison - Glenrowan, VIC 3675 vs Laverton, VIC 3028

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Glenrowan wins 3, Laverton wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGlenrowanLaverton
Median house price$625K$625K
Median unit price$340K$575K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.36%3.90%
Gross rental yield (units)5.68%4.99%
1-year house growth-1.3%+4.5%
3-year house growth+0.0%+6.4%
Vacancy rate2.3%2.2%
Population1,0494,760

Glenrowan vs Laverton: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $625K in Glenrowan and $625K in Laverton.

For units, Glenrowan sits at a median of $340K against $575K in Laverton, which makes Glenrowan the more affordable unit market and Laverton the pricier one.

On cash flow, Glenrowan leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.36%, compared with 3.90% in Laverton, a gap of 0.46 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved -1.3% in Glenrowan and +4.5% in Laverton, so recent momentum favours Laverton, while Glenrowan went backwards.

Looking back three years, Glenrowan houses are +0.0% and Laverton houses +6.4%, so Laverton has compounded faster than Glenrowan over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 2.2% in Laverton and 2.3% in Glenrowan, so landlords in Laverton face less competition for tenants.

Laverton is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,760 against 1,049, roughly 4.5 times the size of Glenrowan; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Glenrowan for rental income, Laverton for recent price momentum, Laverton for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison