Glenroy vs Huntingdon
Property investment comparison - Glenroy, NSW 2640 vs Huntingdon, NSW 2446
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Glenroy wins 1, Huntingdon wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Glenroy | Huntingdon |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $710K | $710K |
| Median unit price | - | $510K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.00% | 4.99% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 4.70% |
| 1-year house growth | +12.7% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +30.1% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.4% | 1.5% |
| Population | 3,528 | 86 |
Glenroy vs Huntingdon: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $710K in Glenroy and $710K in Huntingdon.
On cash flow, Huntingdon leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.99%, compared with 4.00% in Glenroy, a gap of 0.99 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 1.4%.
Glenroy is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,528 against 86, roughly 41 times the size of Huntingdon; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Huntingdon for rental income. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison