Gobur vs Portarlington
Property investment comparison - Gobur, VIC 3719 vs Portarlington, VIC 3223
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Gobur wins 1, Portarlington wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Gobur | Portarlington |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $825K | $825K |
| Median unit price | $380K | $630K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.25% | 3.50% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.24% | 3.80% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +3.6%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 6.1% | 2.1% |
| Population | 102 | 4,436 |
Gobur vs Portarlington: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $825K in Gobur and $825K in Portarlington.
For units, Gobur sits at a median of $380K against $630K in Portarlington, which makes Gobur the more affordable unit market and Portarlington the pricier one.
On cash flow, Portarlington leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.50%, compared with 2.25% in Gobur, a gap of 1.25 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 2.1% in Portarlington and 6.1% in Gobur, so landlords in Portarlington face less competition for tenants.
Portarlington is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,436 against 102, roughly 43 times the size of Gobur; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Portarlington for rental income, Portarlington for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison