Skip to main content

Gobur vs Whittlesea

Property investment comparison - Gobur, VIC 3719 vs Whittlesea, VIC 3757

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Gobur wins 1, Whittlesea wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGoburWhittlesea
Median house price$825K$820K
Median unit price$380K$455K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.25%3.86%
Gross rental yield (units)3.24%5.10%
1-year house growth-+5.1%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate6.1%1.3%
Population1026,117

Gobur vs Whittlesea: what the numbers say

The median house price is $825K in Gobur and $820K in Whittlesea, so Whittlesea is the cheaper entry point, with Gobur houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Gobur sits at a median of $380K against $455K in Whittlesea, which makes Gobur the more affordable unit market and Whittlesea the pricier one.

On cash flow, Whittlesea leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.86%, compared with 2.25% in Gobur, a gap of 1.61 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Whittlesea and 6.1% in Gobur, so landlords in Whittlesea face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Whittlesea is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,117 against 102, roughly 60 times the size of Gobur; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Whittlesea for rental income, Whittlesea for a lower purchase price, Whittlesea for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison