Golden Square vs Laharum
Property investment comparison - Golden Square, VIC 3555 vs Laharum, VIC 3401
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Golden Square wins 2, Laharum wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Golden Square | Laharum |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $610K | $610K |
| Median unit price | $500K | $215K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.51% | 3.21% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.90% | 2.16% |
| 1-year house growth | +11.5% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +16.5% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.9% | - |
| Population | 9,220 | 162 |
Golden Square vs Laharum: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $610K in Golden Square and $610K in Laharum.
For units, Golden Square sits at a median of $500K against $215K in Laharum, which makes Laharum the more affordable unit market and Golden Square the pricier one.
On cash flow, Golden Square leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.51%, compared with 3.21% in Laharum, a gap of 1.30 percentage points.
Golden Square is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,220 against 162, roughly 57 times the size of Laharum; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Golden Square for rental income. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison