Skip to main content

Golden Square vs Tatong

Property investment comparison - Golden Square, VIC 3555 vs Tatong, VIC 3673

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Golden Square wins 3, Tatong wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGolden SquareTatong
Median house price$610K$610K
Median unit price$500K$400K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.51%4.00%
Gross rental yield (units)4.90%2.41%
1-year house growth+11.5%-
3-year house growth+16.5%-
Vacancy rate0.9%3.0%
Population9,220281

Golden Square vs Tatong: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $610K in Golden Square and $610K in Tatong.

For units, Golden Square sits at a median of $500K against $400K in Tatong, which makes Tatong the more affordable unit market and Golden Square the pricier one.

On cash flow, Golden Square leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.51%, compared with 4.00% in Tatong, a gap of 0.51 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Golden Square and 3.0% in Tatong, so landlords in Golden Square face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Golden Square is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,220 against 281, roughly 33 times the size of Tatong; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Golden Square for rental income, Golden Square for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison