Skip to main content

Goodna vs Rosewood

Property investment comparison - Goodna, QLD 4300 vs Rosewood, QLD 4340

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Goodna wins 1, Rosewood wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGoodnaRosewood
Median house price$800K$800K
Median unit price$590K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.80%3.93%
Gross rental yield (units)-2.81%
1-year house growth+17.4%estimate+15.9%
3-year house growth-+63.3%
Vacancy rate0.9%0.6%
Population10,3913,263

Goodna vs Rosewood: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $800K in Goodna and $800K in Rosewood.

On cash flow, Rosewood leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.93%, compared with 3.80% in Goodna, a gap of 0.13 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +17.4% in Goodna (an estimate) and +15.9% in Rosewood, so recent momentum favours Goodna, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Rosewood and 0.9% in Goodna, so landlords in Rosewood face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Goodna is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,391 against 3,263, roughly 3.2 times the size of Rosewood; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Rosewood for rental income, Goodna for recent price momentum, Rosewood for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison