Skip to main content

Goodwood vs West Ulverstone

Property investment comparison - Goodwood, TAS 7010 vs West Ulverstone, TAS 7315

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Goodwood wins 2, West Ulverstone wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGoodwoodWest Ulverstone
Median house price$635K$625K
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)4.80%-
Gross rental yield (units)5.40%4.60%
1-year house growth+16.2%estimate+14.3%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.9%1.0%
Population1,1424,515

Goodwood vs West Ulverstone: what the numbers say

The median house price is $635K in Goodwood and $625K in West Ulverstone, so West Ulverstone is the cheaper entry point, with Goodwood houses about 2% dearer.

Over the past year house prices moved +16.2% in Goodwood (an estimate) and +14.3% in West Ulverstone (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Goodwood, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in West Ulverstone and 1.9% in Goodwood, so landlords in West Ulverstone face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

West Ulverstone is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,515 against 1,142, roughly 4.0 times the size of Goodwood; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: West Ulverstone for a lower purchase price, Goodwood for recent price momentum, West Ulverstone for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison