Skip to main content

Googong vs Jewells

Property investment comparison - Googong, NSW 2620 vs Jewells, NSW 2280

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Googong wins 2, Jewells wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGoogongJewells
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price-$790K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.60%3.86%
Gross rental yield (units)-3.50%
1-year house growth+6.4%+9.2%
3-year house growth+7.6%+32.8%
Vacancy rate3.1%3.6%
Population7,4442,452

Googong vs Jewells: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.1M in Googong and $1.1M in Jewells, so Googong is the cheaper entry point.

On cash flow, Jewells leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.86%, compared with 3.60% in Googong, a gap of 0.26 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +6.4% in Googong and +9.2% in Jewells, so recent momentum favours Jewells, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Googong houses are +7.6% and Jewells houses +32.8%, so Jewells has compounded faster than Googong over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 3.1% in Googong and 3.6% in Jewells, so landlords in Googong face less competition for tenants.

Googong is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,444 against 2,452, roughly 3.0 times the size of Jewells; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Jewells for rental income, Googong for a lower purchase price, Jewells for recent price momentum, Googong for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison