Skip to main content

Googong vs Kariong

Property investment comparison - Googong, NSW 2620 vs Kariong, NSW 2250

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Googong wins 0, Kariong wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGoogongKariong
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price-$835K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.60%3.61%
Gross rental yield (units)-4.09%
1-year house growth+6.4%+8.7%
3-year house growth+7.6%+15.4%
Vacancy rate3.1%1.5%
Population7,4446,485

Googong vs Kariong: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.1M in Googong and $1.1M in Kariong.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 3.60% in Googong and 3.61% in Kariong, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Over the past year house prices moved +6.4% in Googong and +8.7% in Kariong, so recent momentum favours Kariong, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Googong houses are +7.6% and Kariong houses +15.4%, so Kariong has compounded faster than Googong over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Kariong and 3.1% in Googong, so landlords in Kariong face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Googong is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,444 against 6,485, larger than Kariong; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Kariong for recent price momentum, Kariong for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison