Skip to main content

Gooseberry Hill vs Murdoch

Property investment comparison - Gooseberry Hill, WA 6076 vs Murdoch, WA 6150

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Gooseberry Hill wins 2, Murdoch wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGooseberry HillMurdoch
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price-$1.1M
Gross rental yield (houses)3.30%3.30%
Gross rental yield (units)5.95%-
1-year house growth+16.1%+9.5%estimate
3-year house growth+47.7%-
Vacancy rate1.9%1.0%
Population3,3233,352

Gooseberry Hill vs Murdoch: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.3M in Gooseberry Hill and $1.3M in Murdoch, so Gooseberry Hill is the cheaper entry point, with Murdoch houses about 2% dearer.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 3.30% in Gooseberry Hill and 3.30% in Murdoch, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Over the past year house prices moved +16.1% in Gooseberry Hill and +9.5% in Murdoch (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Gooseberry Hill, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Murdoch and 1.9% in Gooseberry Hill, so landlords in Murdoch face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Murdoch is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,352 against 3,323, larger than Gooseberry Hill; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Gooseberry Hill for a lower purchase price, Gooseberry Hill for recent price momentum, Murdoch for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison