Skip to main content

Gordon Park vs Mons

Property investment comparison - Gordon Park, QLD 4031 vs Mons, QLD 4556

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Gordon Park wins 4, Mons wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGordon ParkMons
Median house price$1.7M$1.8M
Median unit price$820K$920K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.40%
Gross rental yield (units)-3.65%
1-year house growth+12.1%+12.2%
3-year house growth+31.8%+31.6%
Vacancy rate0.9%5.0%
Population4,3901,179

Gordon Park vs Mons: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.7M in Gordon Park and $1.8M in Mons, so Gordon Park is the cheaper entry point, with Mons houses about 2% dearer.

For units, Gordon Park sits at a median of $820K against $920K in Mons, which makes Gordon Park the more affordable unit market and Mons the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +12.1% in Gordon Park and +12.2% in Mons, so recent momentum favours Mons, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Gordon Park houses are +31.8% and Mons houses +31.6%, so Gordon Park has compounded faster than Mons over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Gordon Park and 5.0% in Mons, so landlords in Gordon Park face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Gordon Park is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,390 against 1,179, roughly 3.7 times the size of Mons; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Gordon Park for a lower purchase price, Mons for recent price momentum, Gordon Park for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison