Skip to main content

Gordon Park vs Taringa

Property investment comparison - Gordon Park, QLD 4031 vs Taringa, QLD 4068

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Gordon Park wins 4, Taringa wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGordon ParkTaringa
Median house price$1.7M$1.8M
Median unit price$820K$845K
Gross rental yield (houses)-2.47%
Gross rental yield (units)-4.03%
1-year house growth+12.1%+4.3%estimate
3-year house growth+31.8%-
Vacancy rate0.9%1.9%
Population4,3908,732

Gordon Park vs Taringa: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.7M in Gordon Park and $1.8M in Taringa, so Gordon Park is the cheaper entry point, with Taringa houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Gordon Park sits at a median of $820K against $845K in Taringa, which makes Gordon Park the more affordable unit market and Taringa the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +12.1% in Gordon Park and +4.3% in Taringa (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Gordon Park, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Gordon Park and 1.9% in Taringa, so landlords in Gordon Park face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Taringa is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,732 against 4,390, larger than Gordon Park; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Gordon Park for a lower purchase price, Gordon Park for recent price momentum, Gordon Park for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison