Skip to main content

Gormans Hill vs Loxford

Property investment comparison - Gormans Hill, NSW 2795 vs Loxford, NSW 2326

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Gormans Hill wins 2, Loxford wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGormans HillLoxford
Median house price$590K$585K
Median unit price-$460K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.67%4.52%
Gross rental yield (units)4.20%5.16%
1-year house growth+2.3%+21.5%estimate
3-year house growth+24.8%-
Vacancy rate1.4%2.4%
Population88742

Gormans Hill vs Loxford: what the numbers say

The median house price is $590K in Gormans Hill and $585K in Loxford, so Loxford is the cheaper entry point, with Gormans Hill houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Gormans Hill leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.67%, compared with 4.52% in Loxford, a gap of 0.15 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +2.3% in Gormans Hill and +21.5% in Loxford (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Loxford, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Gormans Hill and 2.4% in Loxford, so landlords in Gormans Hill face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Gormans Hill is the bigger suburb, with a population of 887 against 42, roughly 21 times the size of Loxford; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Gormans Hill for rental income, Loxford for a lower purchase price, Loxford for recent price momentum, Gormans Hill for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison