Gormans Hill vs Moobi
Property investment comparison - Gormans Hill, NSW 2795 vs Moobi, NSW 2337
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Gormans Hill wins 0, Moobi wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Gormans Hill | Moobi |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $590K | $580K |
| Median unit price | - | $320K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.67% | 5.20% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.20% | 6.64% |
| 1-year house growth | +2.3% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +24.8% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.4% | 0.6% |
| Population | 887 | 168 |
Gormans Hill vs Moobi: what the numbers say
The median house price is $590K in Gormans Hill and $580K in Moobi, so Moobi is the cheaper entry point, with Gormans Hill houses about 2% dearer.
On cash flow, Moobi leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.20%, compared with 4.67% in Gormans Hill, a gap of 0.53 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Moobi and 1.4% in Gormans Hill, so landlords in Moobi face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Gormans Hill is the bigger suburb, with a population of 887 against 168, roughly 5 times the size of Moobi; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Moobi for rental income, Moobi for a lower purchase price, Moobi for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison