Skip to main content

Gormans Hill vs Pages River

Property investment comparison - Gormans Hill, NSW 2795 vs Pages River, NSW 2337

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Gormans Hill wins 0, Pages River wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGormans HillPages River
Median house price$590K$585K
Median unit price-$320K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.67%5.72%
Gross rental yield (units)4.20%7.38%
1-year house growth+2.3%-
3-year house growth+24.8%-
Vacancy rate1.4%0.8%
Population8875

Gormans Hill vs Pages River: what the numbers say

The median house price is $590K in Gormans Hill and $585K in Pages River, so Pages River is the cheaper entry point, with Gormans Hill houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Pages River leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.72%, compared with 4.67% in Gormans Hill, a gap of 1.05 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Pages River and 1.4% in Gormans Hill, so landlords in Pages River face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Gormans Hill is the bigger suburb, with a population of 887 against 5, roughly 177 times the size of Pages River; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Pages River for rental income, Pages River for a lower purchase price, Pages River for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison