Skip to main content

Gracemere vs Mundingburra

Property investment comparison - Gracemere, QLD 4702 vs Mundingburra, QLD 4812

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Gracemere wins 0, Mundingburra wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGracemereMundingburra
Median house price$675K$675K
Median unit price-$400K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.40%4.40%
Gross rental yield (units)-5.45%
1-year house growth+18.6%+20.0%estimate
3-year house growth+78.8%-
Vacancy rate1.9%0.8%
Population12,0233,594

Gracemere vs Mundingburra: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $675K in Gracemere and $675K in Mundingburra.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 4.40% in Gracemere and 4.40% in Mundingburra, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Over the past year house prices moved +18.6% in Gracemere and +20.0% in Mundingburra (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Mundingburra, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Mundingburra and 1.9% in Gracemere, so landlords in Mundingburra face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Gracemere is the bigger suburb, with a population of 12,023 against 3,594, roughly 3.3 times the size of Mundingburra; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Mundingburra for recent price momentum, Mundingburra for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison