Skip to main content

Graceville vs Sinnamon Park

Property investment comparison - Graceville, QLD 4075 vs Sinnamon Park, QLD 4073

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Graceville wins 1, Sinnamon Park wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGracevilleSinnamon Park
Median house price$1.6M$1.6M
Median unit price$810K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.14%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.54%-
1-year house growth+12.5%+15.2%
3-year house growth+22.7%+43.5%
Vacancy rate0.6%1.5%
Population4,7646,590

Graceville vs Sinnamon Park: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.6M in Graceville and $1.6M in Sinnamon Park, so Sinnamon Park is the cheaper entry point, with Graceville houses about 1% dearer.

Over the past year house prices moved +12.5% in Graceville and +15.2% in Sinnamon Park, so recent momentum favours Sinnamon Park, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Graceville houses are +22.7% and Sinnamon Park houses +43.5%, so Sinnamon Park has compounded faster than Graceville over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Graceville and 1.5% in Sinnamon Park, so landlords in Graceville face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Sinnamon Park is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,590 against 4,764, larger than Graceville; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Sinnamon Park for a lower purchase price, Sinnamon Park for recent price momentum, Graceville for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison