Skip to main content

Grange vs Stretton

Property investment comparison - Grange, QLD 4051 vs Stretton, QLD 4116

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Grange wins 3, Stretton wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGrangeStretton
Median house price$1.9M$2.0M
Median unit price$1.3M-
Gross rental yield (houses)2.58%2.55%
Gross rental yield (units)2.42%4.42%
1-year house growth+11.6%+14.4%
3-year house growth+21.9%+60.0%
Vacancy rate1.1%1.9%
Population4,6154,686

Grange vs Stretton: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.9M in Grange and $2.0M in Stretton, so Grange is the cheaper entry point, with Stretton houses about 2% dearer.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 2.58% in Grange and 2.55% in Stretton, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Over the past year house prices moved +11.6% in Grange and +14.4% in Stretton, so recent momentum favours Stretton, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Grange houses are +21.9% and Stretton houses +60.0%, so Stretton has compounded faster than Grange over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Grange and 1.9% in Stretton, so landlords in Grange face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Stretton is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,686 against 4,615, larger than Grange; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Grange for a lower purchase price, Stretton for recent price momentum, Grange for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison