Skip to main content

Granya vs Nhill

Property investment comparison - Granya, VIC 3701 vs Nhill, VIC 3418

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Granya wins 1, Nhill wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGranyaNhill
Median house price$305K$280K
Median unit price$440K$375K
Gross rental yield (houses)5.86%6.64%
Gross rental yield (units)5.26%2.40%
1-year house growth-+17.4%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate11.7%0.1%
Population882,401

Granya vs Nhill: what the numbers say

The median house price is $305K in Granya and $280K in Nhill, so Nhill is the cheaper entry point, with Granya houses about 9% dearer.

For units, Granya sits at a median of $440K against $375K in Nhill, which makes Nhill the more affordable unit market and Granya the pricier one.

On cash flow, Nhill leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 6.64%, compared with 5.86% in Granya, a gap of 0.78 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.1% in Nhill and 11.7% in Granya, so landlords in Nhill face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Nhill is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,401 against 88, roughly 27 times the size of Granya; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Nhill for rental income, Nhill for a lower purchase price, Nhill for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison