Skip to main content

Great Western vs Newcomb

Property investment comparison - Great Western, VIC 3374 vs Newcomb, VIC 3219

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Great Western wins 1, Newcomb wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGreat WesternNewcomb
Median house price$645K$645K
Median unit price$215K$510K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.00%3.95%
Gross rental yield (units)-4.40%
1-year house growth-+11.7%
3-year house growth-+11.0%
Vacancy rate4.0%1.6%
Population4254,704

Great Western vs Newcomb: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $645K in Great Western and $645K in Newcomb.

For units, Great Western sits at a median of $215K against $510K in Newcomb, which makes Great Western the more affordable unit market and Newcomb the pricier one.

On cash flow, Newcomb leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.95%, compared with 3.00% in Great Western, a gap of 0.95 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Newcomb and 4.0% in Great Western, so landlords in Newcomb face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Newcomb is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,704 against 425, roughly 11 times the size of Great Western; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Newcomb for rental income, Newcomb for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison