Skip to main content

Green Point vs Kahibah

Property investment comparison - Green Point, NSW 2251 vs Kahibah, NSW 2290

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Green Point wins 1, Kahibah wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGreen PointKahibah
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price$830K$870K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.10%-
Gross rental yield (units)3.96%-
1-year house growth+4.5%+13.2%
3-year house growth+16.0%+26.5%
Vacancy rate2.0%0.8%
Population6,8102,603

Green Point vs Kahibah: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.3M in Green Point and $1.3M in Kahibah.

For units, Green Point sits at a median of $830K against $870K in Kahibah, which makes Green Point the more affordable unit market and Kahibah the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +4.5% in Green Point and +13.2% in Kahibah, so recent momentum favours Kahibah, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Green Point houses are +16.0% and Kahibah houses +26.5%, so Kahibah has compounded faster than Green Point over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Kahibah and 2.0% in Green Point, so landlords in Kahibah face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Green Point is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,810 against 2,603, roughly 2.6 times the size of Kahibah; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Kahibah for recent price momentum, Kahibah for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison