Skip to main content

Green Point vs Middle Arm

Property investment comparison - Green Point, NSW 2251 vs Middle Arm, NSW 2580

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Green Point wins 2, Middle Arm wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGreen PointMiddle Arm
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price$830K$560K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.10%2.26%
Gross rental yield (units)3.96%4.75%
1-year house growth+4.5%-
3-year house growth+16.0%-
Vacancy rate2.0%6.0%
Population6,810377

Green Point vs Middle Arm: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.3M in Green Point and $1.3M in Middle Arm.

For units, Green Point sits at a median of $830K against $560K in Middle Arm, which makes Middle Arm the more affordable unit market and Green Point the pricier one.

On cash flow, Green Point leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.10%, compared with 2.26% in Middle Arm, a gap of 0.84 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 2.0% in Green Point and 6.0% in Middle Arm, so landlords in Green Point face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Green Point is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,810 against 377, roughly 18 times the size of Middle Arm; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Green Point for rental income, Green Point for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison