Skip to main content

Green Point vs Upper Wilsons Creek

Property investment comparison - Green Point, NSW 2251 vs Upper Wilsons Creek, NSW 2483

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Green Point wins 2, Upper Wilsons Creek wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGreen PointUpper Wilsons Creek
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price$830K$970K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.10%3.90%
Gross rental yield (units)3.96%3.94%
1-year house growth+4.5%-
3-year house growth+16.0%-
Vacancy rate2.0%0.5%
Population6,81079

Green Point vs Upper Wilsons Creek: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.3M in Green Point and $1.3M in Upper Wilsons Creek.

For units, Green Point sits at a median of $830K against $970K in Upper Wilsons Creek, which makes Green Point the more affordable unit market and Upper Wilsons Creek the pricier one.

On cash flow, Upper Wilsons Creek leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.90%, compared with 3.10% in Green Point, a gap of 0.80 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Upper Wilsons Creek and 2.0% in Green Point, so landlords in Upper Wilsons Creek face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Green Point is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,810 against 79, roughly 86 times the size of Upper Wilsons Creek; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Upper Wilsons Creek for rental income, Upper Wilsons Creek for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison