Skip to main content

Green Point vs Huntingdon

Property investment comparison - Green Point, NSW 2428 vs Huntingdon, NSW 2446

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Green Point wins 1, Huntingdon wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGreen PointHuntingdon
Median house price$715K$710K
Median unit price$545K$510K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.36%4.99%
Gross rental yield (units)4.90%4.70%
1-year house growth+3.0%estimate-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate8.5%1.5%
Population52286

Green Point vs Huntingdon: what the numbers say

The median house price is $715K in Green Point and $710K in Huntingdon, so Huntingdon is the cheaper entry point, with Green Point houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Green Point sits at a median of $545K against $510K in Huntingdon, which makes Huntingdon the more affordable unit market and Green Point the pricier one.

On cash flow, Huntingdon leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.99%, compared with 4.36% in Green Point, a gap of 0.63 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Huntingdon and 8.5% in Green Point, so landlords in Huntingdon face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Green Point is the bigger suburb, with a population of 522 against 86, roughly 6 times the size of Huntingdon; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Huntingdon for rental income, Huntingdon for a lower purchase price, Huntingdon for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison