Skip to main content

Greendale vs Werrington

Property investment comparison - Greendale, NSW 2745 vs Werrington, NSW 2747

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Greendale wins 2, Werrington wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGreendaleWerrington
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$745K$760K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.51%3.47%
Gross rental yield (units)4.57%-
1-year house growth-+11.8%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate2.6%0.8%
Population3145,328

Greendale vs Werrington: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.1M in Greendale and $1.1M in Werrington.

For units, Greendale sits at a median of $745K against $760K in Werrington, which makes Greendale the more affordable unit market and Werrington the pricier one.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 3.51% in Greendale and 3.47% in Werrington, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Werrington and 2.6% in Greendale, so landlords in Werrington face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Werrington is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,328 against 314, roughly 17 times the size of Greendale; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Werrington for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison