Skip to main content

Greenfield Park vs Regents Park

Property investment comparison - Greenfield Park, NSW 2176 vs Regents Park, NSW 2143

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Greenfield Park wins 1, Regents Park wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGreenfield ParkRegents Park
Median house price$1.4M$1.4M
Median unit price-$540K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.52%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.15%5.63%
1-year house growth+10.4%estimate+7.0%
3-year house growth-+11.9%
Vacancy rate2.3%0.7%
Population5,3944,990

Greenfield Park vs Regents Park: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.4M in Greenfield Park and $1.4M in Regents Park, so Regents Park is the cheaper entry point.

Over the past year house prices moved +10.4% in Greenfield Park (an estimate) and +7.0% in Regents Park, so recent momentum favours Greenfield Park, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Regents Park and 2.3% in Greenfield Park, so landlords in Regents Park face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Greenfield Park is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,394 against 4,990, larger than Regents Park; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Regents Park for a lower purchase price, Greenfield Park for recent price momentum, Regents Park for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison