Skip to main content

Greenfield Park vs The Oaks

Property investment comparison - Greenfield Park, NSW 2176 vs The Oaks, NSW 2570

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Greenfield Park wins 3, The Oaks wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGreenfield ParkThe Oaks
Median house price$1.4M$1.4M
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)2.52%2.50%
Gross rental yield (units)4.15%3.80%
1-year house growth+10.4%estimate+10.2%
3-year house growth-+33.9%
Vacancy rate2.3%2.2%
Population5,3942,982

Greenfield Park vs The Oaks: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.4M in Greenfield Park and $1.4M in The Oaks, so The Oaks is the cheaper entry point, with Greenfield Park houses about 1% dearer.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 2.52% in Greenfield Park and 2.50% in The Oaks, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Over the past year house prices moved +10.4% in Greenfield Park (an estimate) and +10.2% in The Oaks, so recent momentum favours Greenfield Park, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 2.3%.

Greenfield Park is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,394 against 2,982, larger than The Oaks; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: The Oaks for a lower purchase price, Greenfield Park for recent price momentum. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison