Skip to main content

Greenvale vs Highton

Property investment comparison - Greenvale, VIC 3059 vs Highton, VIC 3216

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Greenvale wins 4, Highton wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGreenvaleHighton
Median house price$895K$900K
Median unit price$660K$535K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.77%3.50%
Gross rental yield (units)4.59%4.45%
1-year house growth+5.7%estimate+2.3%
3-year house growth--2.6%
Vacancy rate2.7%2.1%
Population21,27420,736

Greenvale vs Highton: what the numbers say

The median house price is $895K in Greenvale and $900K in Highton, so Greenvale is the cheaper entry point, with Highton houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Greenvale sits at a median of $660K against $535K in Highton, which makes Highton the more affordable unit market and Greenvale the pricier one.

On cash flow, Greenvale leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.77%, compared with 3.50% in Highton, a gap of 0.27 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +5.7% in Greenvale (an estimate) and +2.3% in Highton, so recent momentum favours Greenvale, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 2.1% in Highton and 2.7% in Greenvale, so landlords in Highton face less competition for tenants.

Greenvale is the bigger suburb, with a population of 21,274 against 20,736, larger than Highton; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Greenvale for rental income, Greenvale for a lower purchase price, Greenvale for recent price momentum, Highton for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison