Greenwood vs Hazelmere
Property investment comparison - Greenwood, WA 6024 vs Hazelmere, WA 6055
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Greenwood wins 1, Hazelmere wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Greenwood | Hazelmere |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.1M | $1.1M |
| Median unit price | - | $630K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.90% | 3.90% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.60% | 4.96% |
| 1-year house growth | +23.4%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.4% | 0.7% |
| Population | 9,861 | 935 |
Greenwood vs Hazelmere: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.1M in Greenwood and $1.1M in Hazelmere, so Hazelmere is the cheaper entry point.
Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 3.90% in Greenwood and 3.90% in Hazelmere, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.
Rental vacancy is 0.4% in Greenwood and 0.7% in Hazelmere, so landlords in Greenwood face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Greenwood is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,861 against 935, roughly 11 times the size of Hazelmere; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Hazelmere for a lower purchase price, Greenwood for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison