Skip to main content

Greenwood vs Leschenault

Property investment comparison - Greenwood, WA 6024 vs Leschenault, WA 6233

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Greenwood wins 3, Leschenault wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGreenwoodLeschenault
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price-$205K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.90%3.60%
Gross rental yield (units)4.60%8.31%
1-year house growth+23.4%estimate+19.6%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate0.4%1.4%
Population9,8613,058

Greenwood vs Leschenault: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.1M in Greenwood and $1.1M in Leschenault, so Leschenault is the cheaper entry point, with Greenwood houses about 2% dearer.

On cash flow, Greenwood leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.90%, compared with 3.60% in Leschenault, a gap of 0.30 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +23.4% in Greenwood (an estimate) and +19.6% in Leschenault (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Greenwood, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.4% in Greenwood and 1.4% in Leschenault, so landlords in Greenwood face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Greenwood is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,861 against 3,058, roughly 3.2 times the size of Leschenault; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Greenwood for rental income, Leschenault for a lower purchase price, Greenwood for recent price momentum, Greenwood for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison