Skip to main content

Greystanes vs Lakemba

Property investment comparison - Greystanes, NSW 2145 vs Lakemba, NSW 2195

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Greystanes wins 1, Lakemba wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGreystanesLakemba
Median house price$1.5M$1.5M
Median unit price$880K$540K
Gross rental yield (houses)-2.77%
Gross rental yield (units)3.87%5.32%
1-year house growth+8.0%estimate+2.3%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate2.5%1.5%
Population23,51117,092

Greystanes vs Lakemba: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.5M in Greystanes and $1.5M in Lakemba, so Lakemba is the cheaper entry point, with Greystanes houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Greystanes sits at a median of $880K against $540K in Lakemba, which makes Lakemba the more affordable unit market and Greystanes the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +8.0% in Greystanes (an estimate) and +2.3% in Lakemba (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Greystanes, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Lakemba and 2.5% in Greystanes, so landlords in Lakemba face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Greystanes is the bigger suburb, with a population of 23,511 against 17,092, larger than Lakemba; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Lakemba for a lower purchase price, Greystanes for recent price momentum, Lakemba for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison