Skip to main content

Griffin vs Ningi

Property investment comparison - Griffin, QLD 4503 vs Ningi, QLD 4511

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Griffin wins 0, Ningi wins 5. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGriffinNingi
Median house price$995K$990K
Median unit price$780K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.63%3.67%
Gross rental yield (units)-2.90%
1-year house growth+15.6%+16.8%
3-year house growth+43.0%+45.6%
Vacancy rate1.0%0.5%
Population12,2955,349

Griffin vs Ningi: what the numbers say

The median house price is $995K in Griffin and $990K in Ningi, so Ningi is the cheaper entry point, with Griffin houses about 1% dearer.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 3.63% in Griffin and 3.67% in Ningi, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Over the past year house prices moved +15.6% in Griffin and +16.8% in Ningi, so recent momentum favours Ningi, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Griffin houses are +43.0% and Ningi houses +45.6%, so Ningi has compounded faster than Griffin over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Ningi and 1.0% in Griffin, so landlords in Ningi face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Griffin is the bigger suburb, with a population of 12,295 against 5,349, roughly 2.3 times the size of Ningi; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Ningi for a lower purchase price, Ningi for recent price momentum, Ningi for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison