Skip to main content

Grose Vale vs Redhead

Property investment comparison - Grose Vale, NSW 2753 vs Redhead, NSW 2290

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Grose Vale wins 2, Redhead wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGrose ValeRedhead
Median house price$1.8M$1.8M
Median unit price$645K$920K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.95%-
Gross rental yield (units)3.68%-
1-year house growth+7.6%+8.1%estimate
3-year house growth+3.6%-
Vacancy rate5.5%2.3%
Population1,2723,785

Grose Vale vs Redhead: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.8M in Grose Vale and $1.8M in Redhead, so Grose Vale is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Grose Vale sits at a median of $645K against $920K in Redhead, which makes Grose Vale the more affordable unit market and Redhead the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +7.6% in Grose Vale and +8.1% in Redhead (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Redhead, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 2.3% in Redhead and 5.5% in Grose Vale, so landlords in Redhead face less competition for tenants.

Redhead is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,785 against 1,272, roughly 3.0 times the size of Grose Vale; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Grose Vale for a lower purchase price, Redhead for recent price momentum, Redhead for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison