Guildford vs Samson
Property investment comparison - Guildford, WA 6055 vs Samson, WA 6163
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Guildford wins 1, Samson wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Guildford | Samson |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.2M | $1.2M |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 3.25% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.50% | - |
| 1-year house growth | - | +15.7%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | +57.9% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.3% | 1.2% |
| Population | 2,040 | 1,881 |
Guildford vs Samson: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.2M in Guildford and $1.2M in Samson, so Samson is the cheaper entry point, with Guildford houses about 1% dearer.
Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Guildford and 1.2% in Samson, so landlords in Guildford face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Guildford is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,040 against 1,881, larger than Samson; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Samson for a lower purchase price, Guildford for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison