Skip to main content

Gundagai vs Parkes

Property investment comparison - Gundagai, NSW 2722 vs Parkes, NSW 2870

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Gundagai wins 2, Parkes wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGundagaiParkes
Median house price$485K$480K
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)4.89%4.80%
Gross rental yield (units)5.45%-
1-year house growth+0.7%estimate+7.0%
3-year house growth--2.8%
Vacancy rate1.2%2.7%
Population1,69911,324

Gundagai vs Parkes: what the numbers say

The median house price is $485K in Gundagai and $480K in Parkes, so Parkes is the cheaper entry point, with Gundagai houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Gundagai leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.89%, compared with 4.80% in Parkes, a gap of 0.09 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +0.7% in Gundagai (an estimate) and +7.0% in Parkes, so recent momentum favours Parkes, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Gundagai and 2.7% in Parkes, so landlords in Gundagai face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Parkes is the bigger suburb, with a population of 11,324 against 1,699, roughly 7 times the size of Gundagai; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Gundagai for rental income, Parkes for a lower purchase price, Parkes for recent price momentum, Gundagai for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison