Skip to main content

Gundaroo vs Renwick

Property investment comparison - Gundaroo, NSW 2620 vs Renwick, NSW 2575

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Gundaroo wins 4, Renwick wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGundarooRenwick
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price$475K$685K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.05%-
Gross rental yield (units)5.05%3.88%
1-year house growth+4.0%-0.7%
3-year house growth+10.1%+5.1%
Vacancy rate10.1%0.9%
Population1,2331,453

Gundaroo vs Renwick: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.3M in Gundaroo and $1.3M in Renwick.

For units, Gundaroo sits at a median of $475K against $685K in Renwick, which makes Gundaroo the more affordable unit market and Renwick the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +4.0% in Gundaroo and -0.7% in Renwick, so recent momentum favours Gundaroo, while Renwick went backwards.

Looking back three years, Gundaroo houses are +10.1% and Renwick houses +5.1%, so Gundaroo has compounded faster than Renwick over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Renwick and 10.1% in Gundaroo, so landlords in Renwick face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Renwick is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,453 against 1,233, larger than Gundaroo; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Gundaroo for recent price momentum, Renwick for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison