Gwelup vs Hacketts Gully
Property investment comparison - Gwelup, WA 6018 vs Hacketts Gully, WA 6076
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Gwelup wins 1, Hacketts Gully wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Gwelup | Hacketts Gully |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.8M | $1.8M |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.30% | 3.34% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.51% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +14.0%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.7% | 0.4% |
| Population | 5,391 | 55 |
Gwelup vs Hacketts Gully: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.8M in Gwelup and $1.8M in Hacketts Gully, so Gwelup is the cheaper entry point, with Hacketts Gully houses about 2% dearer.
Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 3.30% in Gwelup and 3.34% in Hacketts Gully, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.
Rental vacancy is 0.4% in Hacketts Gully and 1.7% in Gwelup, so landlords in Hacketts Gully face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Gwelup is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,391 against 55, roughly 98 times the size of Hacketts Gully; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Gwelup for a lower purchase price, Hacketts Gully for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison